Planning appeal decision
Whitegates, 75 Gorsey Lane, Mawdesley, Lancashire, L40 3TE
Planning appeal 3331910 at Whitegates, 75 Gorsey Lane, Mawdesley, Lancashire, L40 3TE (Chorley Borough Council) was dismissed on 11 June 2024 by Inspector Major R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site is suitable for residential development having regard to its location, the proposed land use, and the amount of development with respect to the effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt.
8 new build older person’s accessible bungalow dwellings with new vehicular access from Gorsey Lane
- Authority
- Chorley Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Major R
- Postcode
- L40 3TE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the site is suitable for residential development having regard to its location, the proposed land use, and the amount of development with respect to the effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt
- whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
What decided it
The significant harm to the openness of the Green Belt in both spatial and visual terms, which attracts substantial weight and is not clearly outweighed by the benefits of older persons accommodation and housing supply contribution.
The benefits of older persons bungalow provision (significant weight), bungalow house types (moderate weight), and housing supply contribution (moderate weight) do not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to Green Belt openness and inappropriateness of development, such that very special circumstances do not exist.
What the Inspector cited
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 153
- Judgments
- Alison Hook v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government Surrey Heath Borough Council [2020] EWCA Civ 486; John Turner vs SoSCLG and East Dorset Council [2016] EWCA Civ 466; Euro Garages Ltd v SSCLG & Anor [2018] EWHC 1753 (Admin); Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster), Oxton Farm v North Yorkshire CC & Darrington Quarries Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 489; Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster) and others (Respondents) v North Yorkshire County Council (Appellant) [2020] UKSC 3; Hunston Properties Limited v. (1) Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and (2) St. Albans City and District Council [2013] EWHC 2678 (Admin); St Albans City and District Council v (1) Hunston Properties Limited and (2) Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2013] EWCA Civ 1610
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Chorley Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed27 October 20266010419Sibbering's Farmhouse, Dawson Lane, Chorley, PR6 7DT
- Dismissed22 October 20266007934Fleetwood Farm, North Road, Bretherton, PR26 9AY
- Dismissed6 October 2026601319347 Washington Lane, Euxton, Chorley, PR7 6DQ
- Dismissed6 October 20266012610Land Adjacent To St Johns C Of E And Methodist Primary School, School Lane, Brinscall, PR26 6TD
- Dismissed2 July 20266007888Chisnall House Farm, Croston Lane, Chorley, PR7 5HJ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®