Planning appeal decision
Grassed Verge at Houndsden Road, Winchmore Hill, Enfield, London, N21 1LY
Planning appeal 3331927 at Grassed Verge at Houndsden Road, Winchmore Hill, Enfield, London, N21 1LY (London Borough of Enfield) was dismissed on 11 July 2024 by Inspector Francis L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of siting and appearance of the proposed installation on pedestrian or highway safety and the character and appearance of the area, including the contribution made by the amenity value of trees.
the installation of a 20m grey steel mast complete with 6 antennas, 2No. 300mm Dish antennas, 1No. GPS Module, two associated radio equipment cabinets, a meter cabinet (all Dark Green Steel) and enabling operational development works thereto
- Authority
- London Borough of Enfield
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- telecoms · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Francis L
- Postcode
- N21 1LY
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of siting and appearance of the proposed installation on pedestrian or highway safety and the character and appearance of the area, including the contribution made by the amenity value of trees
- If any harm were to occur to pedestrian or highway safety, or to the character and appearance of the area, whether it would be outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed taking into account any suitable alternatives
What decided it
The harm caused to the character and appearance of the area by the siting and appearance of the proposed grey monopole was not outweighed by the identified need for the telecommunications installation at this location.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy D3 of the London Plan 2021Policy CP30 of the Enfield Core Strategy 2010Policy DMD37 of the Enfield Development Management Document 2014
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 121
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Enfield
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed27 October 2026601285577 Conway Road, London, N14 7BD
- Dismissed21 October 202660105412 Queen Annes Grove, Enfield, EN1 2JP
- Allowed20 October 2026600977328 Wolves Lane, London, N13 6DR
- Dismissed29 September 2026601020761 Hawthorn Road, London, N18 1EY
- Dismissed28 September 2026601259821 Merrivale, London, N14 4TE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®