Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed25 March 20243332225

20-24 Mayday Road, Thornton Heath, CR7 7HL

the demolition of existing buildings and redevelopment of site to provide 3 no. replacement buildings ranging from one to five storeys in height, comprising 57 new dwelling, with associated access, parking and landscaping without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref 21/05412/FUL, dated 8 March 2022

Authority
London Borough of Croydon
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Chamberlain G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether, in this instance, a s73 application is an appropriate means to reduce the level of affordable housing previously secured

What decided it

The significant, agreed change in scheme viability since the original permission justified entering into a planning obligation in different terms, making the s73 route to reduce affordable housing appropriate.

the modest conflict with Policy DM1.1 (housing mix) was outweighed by benefits including the delivery of a large number of homes, construction and post-occupation expenditure, and re-use of previously developed land, such that the scheme accorded with the development plan as a whole

Plan policies cited: Policy SP2.5, Policy DM1.1, Policy H4, Policy H5

Judgments cited: Armstrong v Secretary of State for Levelling-Up, Housing and Communities & Anor [2023] EWHC 176 (Admin); Norfolk Homes Limited v North Norfolk District Council & another [2020] EWHC 2265

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.