Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed1 May 20243332283

24 Southspring, SIDCUP, DA15 8EA

erection of self-contained two bedroom dwellinghouse

Authority
Royal Borough of Greenwich
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Savage K

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The significant harm to the character and appearance of the area caused by the incongruous form and uncharacteristic infilling at the street corner demonstrably outweighs the housing delivery benefits in the context of paragraph 11 of the Framework.

The benefits of housing delivery and economic activity were outweighed by the significant harm to character and appearance, with the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighing the benefits when considered against the policies of the Framework taken as a whole

Framework references: 11

Plan policies cited: Policy D3, Policy D4, Policy H(c), Policy DH1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.