Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 June 20243332379

pavement outside Betfred, 64 High Road, LONDON, N22 6HL

installation of an advertised communication hub with defibrillator

Authority
London Borough of Haringey
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
advertisement · Other minor developments
Inspector
Sibley G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal upon the character, appearance and amenity of the area
  • the effect of the proposal upon highway and public safety

What decided it

The proposal would cause unacceptable harm to both the visual amenity and character of the area through cluttered advertising proliferation, and would significantly increase distraction and conflict risks for vulnerable road users at a location already presenting traffic hazards.

Framework references: 118

Plan policies cited: Policy D3 London Plan 2021, Policy D8 London Plan 2021, Policy SP11 Haringey Local Plan Strategic Policies, Policy DM1 Development Management Development Plan Document, Policy DM2 Development Management Development Plan Document, Policy DM3 Development Management Development Plan Document

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.