Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 April 20243332448

Land to the West of Portinscale, alongside A66. , CA12 5RS

Erection of agricultural shed and access track from existing field access

Authority
Lake District
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
agricultural · Other minor developments
Inspector
Martinson P

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the appeal site is an acceptable location for the proposed development having regard to the development plan policies and the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The proposal would cause significant harm to the character and appearance of the landscape and the pastoral qualities of the National Park, conflicting with development plan policies that require the highest level of protection for landscape, and no convincing case for the necessity of the development in this location was demonstrated.

Plan policies cited: Policy 01, Policy 02, Policy 05, Policy 06

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.