Planning appeal decision
The Sandrock, 152 Upper Shirley Road, Croydon, CR0 5HA
Planning appeal 3332706 at The Sandrock, 152 Upper Shirley Road, Croydon, CR0 5HA (London Borough of Croydon) was dismissed on 9 May 2024 by Inspector Mileham P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.
a two storey, side and rear extension to The Sandrock Public House to provide an enlarged service (including front seating area) for the existing pub and conversion of the upper floors including extension to create four apartments. The construction of nine three storey houses to the rear with associated hard and soft landscaping, car parking, a new crossover along Sandrock Place, boundary treatment and cycle and refuse storage
- Authority
- London Borough of Croydon
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Mileham P
- Postcode
- CR0 5HA
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of future occupiers having regard to accessibility, security, daylight and outlook
- whether the proposal would avoid harm to protected species and secure sufficient biodiversity net gain and urban greening
- whether the proposed development would be sufficiently viable to contribute towards affordable housing requirements
- the effect of the proposed development on the accessibility of the parking provision, recycling facilities and cycle storage
- whether the proposed development would secure affordable housing, employment and skills, air quality, carbon emissions offset, and parking and highway works contributions
What decided it
The proposal would result in greater harm to character and appearance and living conditions of future occupiers than the fallback permission, and there was unresolved uncertainty regarding harm to protected species, which together meant the benefits of housing delivery could not outweigh the identified harms and policy conflicts.
The benefits of 13 dwellings, affordable housing contribution, economic benefits from construction, biodiversity net gain above requirements, and retention of additional trees were outweighed by the harmful effects on character and appearance, living conditions of future occupiers, and unresolved uncertainty regarding protected species harm, resulting in conflict with the development plan as a whole
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SP4Policy DM10Policy SP2Policy DM27Policy SP2.4Policy SP2.5Policy SP2.6Policy SP8Policy DM13Policy DM29Policy DM30Policy SP6Policy SP6.2Policy SP6.4Policy DM25.3Policy SP7.4Policy DM28Policy SP3Policy SP8.15Policy SP8.16
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 135
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Croydon
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed26 October 202660131107 Quadrant Road, Thornton Heath, Croydon, CR7 7DB
- Dismissed22 October 2026601430177-81, North End, Croydon, CR0 1TJ
- Dismissed22 October 202660096413 The Spinney, Off Warren Road, Purley, CR8 1AB
- Dismissed21 October 20266011277770 London Road, Thornton Heath, CR7 6JB
- Dismissed8 October 2026601058811 Chatsworth Road, Croydon, CR0 1HE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®