Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 July 20243332836

Plough Inn, 3 Quaker Lane, Thornbury, South Gloucestershire, BS35 2AD

Planning appeal 3332836 at Plough Inn, 3 Quaker Lane, Thornbury, South Gloucestershire, BS35 2AD (South Gloucestershire Council) was dismissed on 18 July 2024 by Inspector Moss J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would preserve the Grade II listed building or any features of special architectural or historic interest which it possesses.

the construction of a second and third story to form a self-contained maisonette

Appeal type
other · Listed Building Consent & Conservation Area Consent Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Moss J
Postcode
BS35 2AD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would preserve the Grade II listed building or any features of special architectural or historic interest which it possesses
  • Whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Thornbury Conservation Area
  • The effect of the development on the living conditions of its occupiers, having regard to private amenity space provision

What decided it

The proposal would not preserve the Grade II listed building or the character and appearance of the Thornbury Conservation Area, and would fail to provide adequate private amenity space for occupiers, with insufficient public benefits to justify the harm caused.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS9Policy PSP17Policy CS1Policy PSP1Policy PSP43
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 205Paragraph 206Paragraph 208

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

31 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in South Gloucestershire Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266012302
    61 Durban Road, Bristol, BS34 5HG
  2. Allowed16 October 20266014921
    Land At 39 Bude Road, Filton, BS34 7HW
  3. Dismissed13 October 20266011871
    49 Court Road, Kingswood, Bristol, BS15 9QG
  4. Dismissed13 October 20266010963
    Elmbarn Farm, Westerleigh Road, Westerleigh, BS37 8QF
  5. Dismissed13 October 20266009931
    Land at Wapley Road, Codrington, Bristol, BS37 6RY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.