Planning appeal decision
1 Old Hill , Orpington, Kent, BR6 6BW
Planning appeal 3332878 at 1 Old Hill , Orpington, Kent, BR6 6BW (London Borough of Bromley) was dismissed on 23 July 2024 by Inspector Gee R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
proposed to demolish dog groomers and construct a one bedbroom single family dwellinghouse”
- Authority
- London Borough of Bromley
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Gee R
- Postcode
- BR6 6BW
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- the effect on the character and appearance of the area
- whether the proposal would provide for acceptable living conditions for future occupiers, with particular regard to internal and external space standards
- the effect of the proposed development on highway safety with particular reference to parking
- if the proposal would be inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the proposal
What decided it
The substantial weight required to be given to harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness is not clearly outweighed by the limited weight of other considerations, including housing supply benefits, such that very special circumstances do not exist.
The substantial weight to be given to the harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, combined with harm to character and appearance, living conditions, and highway safety, is not clearly outweighed by the limited weight of housing supply and economic benefits, and the Green Belt provides a clear reason for refusal under the tilted balance.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy 49 of the London Borough of Bromley Local PlanPolicy G2 of The London Plan 2021Policy D6 of The London Plan 2021Policy 4 of the London Borough of Bromley Local PlanPolicy 3 of the London Borough of Bromley Local PlanPolicy 8 of the London Borough of Bromley Local PlanPolicy 37 of the London Borough of Bromley Local PlanPolicy 30 of the London Borough of Bromley Local PlanPolicy 32 of the London Borough of Bromley Local Plan
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 154Paragraph 155
- Judgments
- Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWCH 2823 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Bromley
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Split Decision5 August 20263378375Land Adjoining and to the West of Jodeen Animal Sanctuary, Sevenoaks Road, Halstead, Kent, TN14 7HR
- Planning permission granted17 June 20263351724Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd, 30 Station Road, Orpington, BR6 0SA
- Allowed28 May 20266007385223 Crofton Lane, Petts Wood, Orpington, Kent, BR6 0BL
- Dismissed19 May 20266001435Former Public Conveniences, 2 High Street, Green Street Green, Orpington, BR6 6BQ
- Dismissed12 May 2026600251254 Stanley Road, Bromley, BR2 9JH
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®