Planning appeal decision
Lushill Farmyard , Castle Eaton, SN6 7TA
Planning appeal 3333158 at Lushill Farmyard , Castle Eaton, SN6 7TA (Swindon Borough Council) was allowed on 29 July 2024 by Inspector Worley E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be in a suitable location for residential development, with particular regard to the policies in the Swindon Borough Local Plan 2026, adopted 2015 and the National Planning Policy Framework.
the demolition of existing farm buildings, conversion of stone barn and extension to create single dwelling (Class C3), erection of single new dwelling (Class C3), garages, car parking, landscaping and associated works
- Authority
- Swindon Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Worley E
- Postcode
- SN6 7TA
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be in a suitable location for residential development, with particular regard to the policies in the Swindon Borough Local Plan 2026, adopted 2015 and the National Planning Policy Framework
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposed development on the North Meadow and Clattinger Farm Special Area of Conservation
- whether there are any other material considerations that may indicate that planning permission should be granted
What decided it
The Council's inability to demonstrate adequate housing land supply, combined with the realistic fallback position of Class Q prior approval generating comparable impacts, meant the presumption in favour of sustainable development under NPPF paragraph 11(d)(i) indicated permission should be granted despite the location conflict.
The significant weight attached to the conflict with development plan policies on location and sustainable transport was outweighed by the valuable contribution to housing supply in circumstances where the Council cannot demonstrate adequate supply, the benefits to non-designated heritage assets, the moderate weight given to enhancement of site appearance, and the significant weight of the fallback position; the adverse impact does not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SD1Policy SD2Policy DE1Policy EN5Policy EN4
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Swindon
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed1 July 20266005705Land Adjacent to Lynt Road, Inglesham, Inglesham, SN6 7QX
- Allowed4 March 20266003605Rowenburgh, High Street, Wanborough, Swindon, SN4 0AE
- Dismissed9 February 202660005973 Westlecot Road, Swindon, Wiltshire, SN1 4EZ
- Allowed9 January 20266000512Prospect Court, 60 Prospect Place, Swindon, SN1 3LJ
- Dismissed7 November 20253368149Land at Moorleaze Farm, Wanborough, Swindon, SN4 0SW
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®