Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 April 20243333215

Land Adjacent to 60 High Street, Trumpington, Cambridge, CB2 9LS

Planning appeal 3333215 at Land Adjacent to 60 High Street, Trumpington, Cambridge, CB2 9LS (Cambridge City Council) was dismissed on 12 April 2024 by Inspector Dade E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would preserve Grade II listed building, Nos 60-62 High Street, its setting, and any of the features of special architectural or historic interest that it possesses; and the extent to which it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Trumpington Conservation Area.

extension and conversion of existing garage into a single bed dwelling

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Dade E
Postcode
CB2 9LS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would preserve Grade II listed building, Nos 60-62 High Street, its setting, and any of the features of special architectural or historic interest that it possesses; and the extent to which it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Trumpington Conservation Area
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupants of Sixpence Lodge

What decided it

The harm to the setting of the listed building and character of the conservation area, which attracted great weight and was not outweighed by the modest public benefit of providing one dwelling.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 52Policy 57Policy 61Policy 50
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 205Paragraph 206Paragraph 208

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

24 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Cambridge

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed14 October 20266012507
    21 Earl Street, Cambridge, CB1 1JR
  2. Dismissed14 October 20266008906
    Land At The Rear Of 31 Neale Close, Cambridge, CB1 3LE
  3. Dismissed13 October 20266009980
    2 Cranleigh Close, Trumpington, Cambridge, CB2 9NP
  4. Dismissed8 October 20266010726
    127 Histon Road, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB4 3JD
  5. Dismissed30 September 20266012281
    Pavement at East Road, Cambridge, CB1 1BH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.