Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice upheld11 August 20253333339

18- 19 Charlotte Street, Brighton, ., BN2 1AG

described on the application form as internal refurbishment of basement

Authority
Brighton and Hove City Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Appeal against Enforcement Listed Building Notice/Enforcement Conservation Area Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Phillips A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Appeal A ground (e) and Appeal B: the effect of the works on the special architectural and historic interest of the listed building
  • Appeal A ground (f): whether copies of the listed building enforcement notice were served as required by section 38(4)
  • Appeal A ground (i): whether the steps required by the notice would serve the purpose of restoring the character of the building to its former state

What decided it

The external painting caused harmful and discordant visual change to the building's historic character and appearance that could not be justified by any identified public benefit, and the basement refurbishment application lacked sufficient detail to permit assessment.

Framework references: 201, 205

Plan policies cited: CP12, CP15, DM27, DM18, DM20, DM21, DM26

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.