Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 June 20243333568

101 Sandy Lane, MACCLESFIELD, SK10 4RJ

single storey extension to the rear of existing dwelling

Authority
Cheshire East
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
McDonagh C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The cumulative effect of extensions would result in disproportionate additions to the original building in breach of Green Belt policy, with no material considerations of sufficient weight to justify the harm.

Framework references: 142, 153, 154, 155

Plan policies cited: Policy PG3, Policy RUR11

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.