Planning appeal decision
101 Sandy Lane, MACCLESFIELD, SK10 4RJ
single storey extension to the rear of existing dwelling
- Authority
- Cheshire East
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- McDonagh C
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The cumulative effect of extensions would result in disproportionate additions to the original building in breach of Green Belt policy, with no material considerations of sufficient weight to justify the harm.
Framework references: 142, 153, 154, 155
Plan policies cited: Policy PG3, Policy RUR11
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®