Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed6 September 20243333583

Land At Junction of Larch Avenue And Silwood Road, Sunninghill Ascot, SL5 0QB

the erection of 2 no detached (self-build) family dwelling houses utilising existing access point with detached garaging access & associated works

Authority
Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Dade E

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect of the proposal on climate change
  • The effect of the proposal on the integrity of European sites, with particular regard to the Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area (SPA)

What decided it

The proposal qualifies as limited infilling within a village envelope under Policy QP5 and paragraph 154(e) of the Framework, and all material planning considerations have been satisfactorily addressed through conditions and planning obligations.

Framework references: 11, 54, 57, 142, 152, 154, 162, 185

Plan policies cited: Policy QP5, Policy QP3, Policy SP2, Policy NR4, Ascot, Sunninghill & Sunningdale Neighbourhood Plan 2014 Policies NP/DG1, Ascot, Sunninghill & Sunningdale Neighbourhood Plan 2014 Policies NP/DG2, Ascot, Sunninghill & Sunningdale Neighbourhood Plan 2014 Policies NP/DG3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.