Planning appeal decision
288-292 Lymington Road, Highcliffe, BH23 5ET
Planning appeal 3334179 at 288-292 Lymington Road, Highcliffe, BH23 5ET (Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole) was dismissed on 13 May 2024 by Inspector Leonard S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the vitality and viability of the District Centre.
alterations to existing shop frontage, extension of building at first and second storey level. Creation of 3 flats at ground floor, 1 flat at first floor, 1 flat at second floor, 3 maisonettes at first and second floor. Demolition of rear single storey outbuildings and two-storey building at rear containing 1 flat (9 residential units in total)
- Authority
- Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Leonard S
- Postcode
- BH23 5ET
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the vitality and viability of the District Centre
- The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of future occupiers of the ground floor flats with particular regard to outlook and sunlight/daylight provision
- The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of future occupiers of flat M1 with particular regard to outdoor living space
- Whether the proposal can provide adequate mitigation for the Dorset Heathlands European Protected Site (EPS)
What decided it
The significant harm to the vitality and viability of the Highcliffe District Centre from the loss of ground floor commercial floorspace significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of housing delivery, even under the tilted balance applicable due to the Council's inability to demonstrate a 5-year housing land supply.
The modest benefits of 8 additional dwellings and economic benefits from construction and occupation were outweighed by the significant harm to the vitality and viability of the District Centre from the loss of ground floor commercial uses, resulting in the proposal failing to constitute sustainable development.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Neighbourhood Plan Policy HWNP2Core Strategy Policy CH6Core Strategy Policy HE2Saved Policy H12 of the Borough of Christchurch Local Plan (2001)
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 8Paragraph 60Paragraph 70Paragraph 135Paragraph 7
- Judgments
- Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Bournemouth Christchurch and Poole
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed29 September 2026600783665a Richmond Wood Road, Bournemouth, BH8 9DQ
- Allowed28 September 20266007175281-291 and The Old Joinery, Bournemouth Road, Poole, BH14 9AH
- Allowed24 September 202660071875 Higher Blandford Road, Poole, BH18 9AB
- Allowed4 September 2026601111118 Sandbourne Road, Bournemouth, BH4 8JH
- Allowed4 September 20266003539Marina Court, 34 Banks Road, Poole, BH13 7QE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®