Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 June 20243334272

34A, 34B and rear of 34 Arkwright Road, Croydon, CR2 0LL

demolition of existing dwellinghouses at 34A and 34B Arkwright Road and the construction of 9 dwellinghouses 3 storeys in height together with associated parking, access and landscaping

Authority
London Borough of Croydon
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Lawrence E

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character of the local area
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of the adjoining properties in Ridge Langley, with particular regard to privacy
  • Whether the scheme makes adequate provision for services and infrastructure to meet the requirements arising from the occupation of the development

What decided it

The material and unacceptable harm to the character of the locality through the cramped, visually hard and urban design of the development, combined with the unacceptable loss of privacy for neighbouring occupiers, could not be justified by the benefits of providing nine family-sized dwellings.

Framework references: 125, 131, 135

Plan policies cited: Policy SP2, Policy DM1, Policy SP4.1, Policy DM10, Policy DM10.6, Policy DM13, Policy DM23, Policy DM29, Policy DM30, Policy SP6, Policy SP8, London Plan Policy D3, London Plan Policy D4, London Plan Policy H1, London Plan Policy H2, London Plan Policy GG2, London Plan Policy GG4, London Plan Policy SI1, London Plan Policy SI2, London Plan Policy T1, London Plan Policy T2, London Plan Policy T4, London Plan Policy T6.1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.