Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 October 20243334453

123 Old Farleigh Road, SOUTH CROYDON, CR2 8QH

the demolition of existing dwellinghouse and outbuildings and erection of 6 houses with associated car parking, cycle and refuse storage and landscaping

Authority
London Borough of Croydon
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Nilsson A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of occupants of surrounding residential properties with regard to outlook and privacy
  • Whether the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupants
  • The effect of the proposed development on highway safety
  • Whether the proposed development would cause an increase in flooding
  • Whether the proposed development would make acceptable provision for sustainable transport improvements and enhancements
  • Whether the proposed development would make acceptable provision for the relocation of slow worms

What decided it

The cumulative harm to character and appearance, neighbouring amenity, future occupant living conditions, highway safety, sustainable transport provision, and biodiversity mitigation outweighed the moderate benefits of housing delivery and site improvement.

Plan policies cited: Policy DM10, Policy DM28, Policy SP4.1, Policy SP7, Policy D3, Policy D4, Policy G7, Policy D6, Policy D7, Policy DM29, Policy DM30, Policy DM25, Policy SI13, Policy SP8.12, Policy SP8.13, Policy SP8, Policy DM27, Policy G6

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.