Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed24 January 20253334519

110 Norbury Hill, Norbury, London, SW16 3RT

Planning appeal 3334519 at 110 Norbury Hill, Norbury, London, SW16 3RT (London Borough of Croydon) was dismissed on 24 January 2025 by Inspector Rogers J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including trees.

the demolition of an existing bungalow and adjoining garage. Erection of 5 x terraced houses with associated access, parking, photovoltaic panels, landscaping, refuse and cycle stores

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Rogers J
Postcode
SW16 3RT

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including trees
  • the effect of the proposal on the highway safety of users of Norbury Hill and future occupiers of the dwellings
  • whether the proposed development includes adequate fire safety measures
  • the effect of the proposal on ecology and biodiversity
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with specific regard to outlook and privacy

What decided it

The proposal's harm to character and appearance through introduction of incongruous terraced backland development, combined with unresolvable highway safety and fire safety concerns arising from the constrained access, outweighed the moderate housing benefits.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D3Policy D4Policy D5Policy D12Policy T4Policy T5Policy T6Policy T7Policy G6Policy SP4Policy SP8Policy DM10Policy DM13Policy DM27Policy DM28Policy DM29Policy DM30

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

471 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Croydon

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed28 October 20266015751
    20 Newark Road, South Croydon, CR2 6HQ
  2. Dismissed26 October 20266014574
    58 Kingswood Way, South Croydon, CR2 8QQ
  3. Dismissed26 October 20266013110
    7 Quadrant Road, Thornton Heath, Croydon, CR7 7DB
  4. Dismissed22 October 20266014301
    77-81, North End, Croydon, CR0 1TJ
  5. Dismissed22 October 20266009641
    3 The Spinney, Off Warren Road, Purley, CR8 1AB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.