Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 October 20243334684

Village Farm, Birmingham Road, Ansley, Nuneaton, CV10 9PS

Planning appeal 3334684 at Village Farm, Birmingham Road, Ansley, Nuneaton, CV10 9PS (North Warwickshire Borough Council) was dismissed on 10 October 2024 by Inspector Worley E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.

the demolition of workshops/building, construction of 6 no. 3 bed, 7 no. 4 bed, garages, associated parking and access

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Worley E
Postcode
CV10 9PS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect on highway safety
  • the effect on flood risk with regard to surface water drainage
  • the effect of the development on the living conditions of the occupiers of the neighbouring properties with specific regard to privacy and outlook
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the proposal would make adequate provision for affordable housing
  • the effect on biodiversity
  • whether the proposal would include appropriate measures for renewable energy generation
  • whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations and if so, whether this would amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt causing substantial harm to openness, and combined with harm to highway safety, the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development do not exist.

The substantial weight given to Green Belt harm and harm to openness, combined with harm to highway safety, was not clearly outweighed by the moderate weight attributed to housing delivery benefits and economic benefits, such that very special circumstances do not exist.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy LP3Policy LP9Policy LP14Policy LP16Policy LP29Policy LP30Policy LP33Policy LP35Policy LP37Policy LP1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 154Paragraph 114Paragraph 115Paragraph 180

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

7 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in North Warwickshire

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed3 August 20266010427
    Land Opposite Quarry House, Nuneaton Road, Furnace End, Coleshill, B46 2NG
  2. Dismissed30 July 20266009798
    Land 120m North East of Ridley House, Ridley Lane, Nether Whitacre, B46 2DH
  3. Allowed22 June 20266004388
    Land Between 10 And 32, Birmingham Road, Whitacre Heath, B46 2EN
  4. Allowed11 March 20263368956
    Dunton Stables Equine Centre, Bodymoor Heath Lane, Bodymoor Heath, Kingsbury, Warwickshire, B76 0EQ
  5. Allowed5 March 20263371147
    Land North West of Newton Regis Village Hall, Austrey Lane, Newton Regis, Warwickshire, B79 0NP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.