Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision10 July 20243334848

r/o 56 Richmond Avenue, Islington, LONDON, N1 0NA

demolition of the existing single storey building to allow for the creation of a self-contained single storey studio dwelling

Authority
London Borough of Islington
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Sabu R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would provide a suitable living environment for future occupiers with regard to privacy, outlook and light
  • Whether the proposal would provide adequate contribution towards affordable housing
  • The effect of the proposal on nearby trees
  • Whether the proposal would preserve a Grade II listed building, Numbers 54 and 56 (even) and attached railings and garden gate (Nos 54 and 56), and any of the features of special architectural or historic interest that it possesses and the extent to which the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Barnsbury Conservation Area

What decided it

The proposal fails to provide a suitable living environment for future occupiers with regard to privacy, outlook and light, and fails to make adequate affordable housing provision, which are decisive factors for dismissing the planning permission appeal, while the heritage considerations are satisfactory for allowing the listed building consent appeal.

Plan policies cited: London Plan Policy D6, London Plan Policy G6, London Plan Policy G7, London Plan Policy HC1, SDMP Policy H3, SDMP Policy H4, SDMP Policy H5, SDMP Policy H8, SDMP Policy G4, SDMP Policy G5, SDMP Policy PLAN1, SDMP Policy DH1, SDMP Policy DH2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.