Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed23 September 20243335037

Clandon, Leonard Avenue, Otford, Kent, TN14 5RB

the extension of existing property to comprise 1no. new two storey residential dwelling and associated works – resubmission of planning permission 23/00888/FUUL

Authority
Sevenoaks District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Rafferty C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposal on the setting of nearby heritage assets

What decided it

The harm to the setting of the designated heritage asset (Colet's Well) and the non-designated heritage asset (The Woodman Public House) provides a clear reason for refusal under Framework paragraph 11(d) footnote 7, which outweighs the limited public benefits of delivering a single additional dwelling.

The limited public benefits of providing a 4-bedroom dwelling on brownfield land with effective use of airspace were outweighed by the harm to the setting of designated and non-designated heritage assets, as the Framework requires great weight to be given to the conservation of designated heritage assets and clear and convincing justification for any harm to their significance.

Framework references: 11

Plan policies cited: Policy SP1 of the Sevenoaks District Council Local Development Framework Core Strategy 2011, Policy EN1 of the Sevenoaks District Council Allocations and Development Management Plan 2015, Policy EN4 of the Sevenoaks District Council Allocations and Development Management Plan 2015, Otford Village Design Statement 2 2015

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.