Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed1 July 20243335077

The Fox, Rushton Spencer, MACCLESFIELD, SK11 0RU

garage extension

Authority
Staffordshire Moorlands District Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Moulton E

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect on the openness of the Green Belt
  • If the development is inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal would result in a disproportionate addition to the original building contrary to paragraph 154(c) of the Framework and would harm the openness of the Green Belt, with no very special circumstances identified to justify the inappropriate development.

Framework references: 142, 152, 153, 154

Plan policies cited: Policy SS10

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.