Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld26 January 20263335127

1A Priory Stables, Shepperton, TW17 9NU

Planning appeal 3335127 at 1A Priory Stables, Shepperton, TW17 9NU (Spelthorne Borough Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 26 January 2026 by Inspector Willows P, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development is inappropriate in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.

Change of use of the land for the stationing of 6 static homes for Gypsy / Traveller occupation, with associated hard and soft landscaping

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Hearing
Development
caravan-gypsy · Change of use
Inspector
Willows P
Postcode
TW17 9NU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development is inappropriate in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
  • The effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt and its purposes.
  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether the development complies with policies designed to address flood risk.
  • Whether the development causes or is affected by ground contamination
  • Whether the site is appropriate for this residential use having regard to potential impacts from the electricity generation development proposed on adjacent land, with particular regard to noise and air quality.
  • Whether any harm to the Green Belt, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, including any need for the development and the circumstances of those living at the site, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development.

What decided it

Unresolved flood risk safety concerns (failure of the sequential test and no demonstrated safe means of escape) combined with inappropriate, harmful Green Belt development provided strong reasons that were not clearly outweighed by the shortfall in Traveller pitch provision, so very special circumstances did not exist.

Substantial harm to the Green Belt, together with harm to character and appearance and flood risk concerns, was not clearly outweighed by the shortfall in Traveller pitch provision and the interests of site occupants, so very special circumstances did not exist and both appeals were dismissed, save for the extension of the enforcement compliance period to 6 months.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy GB1Policy EN1Policy EN8Policy LO1Policy E3Policy HO6
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 143Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 170Paragraph 174Paragraph 175Paragraph 176
Judgments
Mead Realisations Ltd v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government [2025] EWCA Civ 3; Doncaster MBC v FSS & Angela Smith [2007]; SCDC v. SSCLG and Julie Brown [2008] EWCA Civ 1010

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

95 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Spelthorne Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed4 August 20266006583
    35 Oakfield Road, Ashford, TW15 1DN
  2. Allowed18 June 20266004573
    25 Edward Way, Surrey, Ashford, TW15 3AY
  3. Allowed8 June 20266008311
    2 Cumberland Road, Ashford, TW15 3BX
  4. Notice varied and upheld13 May 20263345013
    Land to the South of Bedfont Road, Stanwell, Staines, TW19 7LE
  5. Quashed On Legal Grounds1 May 20263359636
    58 Green Lane, Shepperton, Surrey, TW17 8DT

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.