Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision8 April 20243335586

9 Woodville Gardens, London, W5 2LG

the erection of a single storey rear extension, addition of roof light to the main roof, addition and adjustment of windows to the rear elevation of the outrigger erection, enlargement of front vehicular gate and additional pedestrian access and removal of small tree to the rear garden

Authority
London Borough of Ealing
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Barnes D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host property and the surrounding area

What decided it

The proposed rear extension's wrap-around form and scale would unacceptably harm the character and appearance of the Conservation Area by disrupting the established rhythm of rear elevations, whereas the front gate and pedestrian access alterations would not cause such harm.

Plan policies cited: Policy 7C, Policy HC1, Policy 7.4, Policy D3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.