Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 June 20243335624

Land to Rear of and No.5a Noah's Ark, KEMSING, KENT, TN15 6PA

the demolition of existing buildings and erection of 7 dwellings with associated access, parking and landscaping (resubmission of 22/0368/FUL)

Authority
Sevenoaks District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Naylor R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and relevant development plan policies and its effect on the openness of the Green Belt
  • Would the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt with a greater impact on openness than existing development, and the benefits of housing delivery and other considerations do not amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it.

The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and increased impact on openness was not clearly outweighed by the significant weight given to housing supply contribution and modest weight given to environmental health improvements, social and economic benefits, and biodiversity net gain.

Framework references: 152, 154

Plan policies cited: Policy LO1, Policy LO8

Judgments cited: Wood v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2014] EWHC 683 (Admin); Turner v SSCLG & East Dorset Council [2016] EWCA Civ 466

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.