Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed21 May 20243335887

Land Adjacent to 300 Kings Road, Reading , RG1 4HP

construction of a part five part three storey building of 14 residential apartments (C3) and associated under croft car parking

Authority
Reading Borough Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Conde L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would make adequate provision for affordable housing
  • Whether the proposed development would make adequate provision towards social and economic infrastructure
  • Whether the proposed development would make adequate provision towards carbon off-setting measures
  • Whether the proposed development would provide an appropriate mix of housing to meet identified needs

What decided it

The completed Section 106 agreement, informed by the appellant's viability evidence, adequately secured affordable housing (via a late-stage review), infrastructure and carbon off-setting contributions, allowing the scheme to be found in overall accordance with the development plan.

the proposal was found to accord with the development plan as a whole, with no material considerations indicating a decision should be taken otherwise

Framework references: 57

Plan policies cited: Policy H3, Policy CC9, Policy H5, Policy H2, Policy CC3

Judgments cited: Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE [JPL 1982 P37]; Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.