Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Quashed On Legal Grounds9 September 20243335908

Land at Former Coal Yard, Thrupp Lane, Radley Abingdon, Oxfordshire , OX14 3NG

Planning appeal 3335908 at Land at Former Coal Yard, Thrupp Lane, Radley Abingdon, Oxfordshire , OX14 3NG (Oxfordshire County Council) was decided (quashed on legal grounds) on 9 September 2024 by Inspector Savage M, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the appeal site comprises a separate planning unit or forms part of a wider mixed-use planning unit encompassing the former coal yard.

Without planning permission, a material change of use of the land from a coal yard to the importation, storage, processing and transfer of waste material, associated parking/storage, and operational development including a fixed canopy building and portakabin office/facilities building

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Hearing
Development
minerals-waste · Change of use
Inspector
Savage M
Postcode
OX14 3NG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the appeal site comprises a separate planning unit or forms part of a wider mixed-use planning unit encompassing the former coal yard
  • Whether the enforcement notice can be corrected under section 176 without causing injustice to the appellant or the Council

What decided it

The enforcement notice's allegation failed to identify that the appeal site formed part of a wider mixed-use planning unit and its component activities, and correcting this defect would cause injustice, rendering the notice invalid beyond correction.

What the Inspector cited

Judgments
Miller-Mead v MHLG [1963] 2 WLR 225; Burdle & Williams v SSE & New Forest DC [1972] 1 WLR 1207; Church Commissioners v SSE & Gateshead MBC [1996] 71 P. & C.R.; Ralls v SSE and another [1997] Lexis Citation 3720

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

17 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Oxfordshire County Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed18 May 20263361505
    White Cross Farm, Reading Road, Cholsey, OX10 9HG
  2. Unknown24 March 20263354172
    Appeal 3354172
  3. Unknown23 March 20263350366
    Appeal 3350366
  4. Unknown17 February 20263377343
    Land Adjoining Appleton Road Common, Cumnor, Oxford, OX2 9QH
  5. Unknown13 February 20263348622
    Appeal 3348622

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.