®Planning appeal decision
54-62 Broadway Market, London, E8 4QJ
Planning appeal 3335962 at 54-62 Broadway Market, London, E8 4QJ (London Borough of Hackney) was allowed on 29 August 2024 by Inspector Jarvis P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect on the character and appearance of the area including the Broadway Conservation Area (CA).
Appeal A: replacement of casement windows to single door for access to private amenity space; steel framed structure at rear elevation to provide private amenity space for each dwelling; 1100mm high steel balustrading, timber infill structure and composite decking material, all treated with fire proof treatment; obscure glass screens proposed between balconies separating dwellings to maintain privacy; installation of external extractor flue which serves no. 62 restaurant; replacement of existing rear casement window to no. 62 with large single bi-fold window (alterations to previously approved scheme ref: 2016/0092). Appeal B: replacement of casement windows to single door for access to private amenity space; installation of external extractor flue which serves no. 62 restaurant; replacement of existing rear casement window to no. 62 with large single bi-fold window (alterations to previously approved scheme ref: 2016/0092).
- Authority
- London Borough of Hackney
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Jarvis P
- Postcode
- E8 4QJ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect on the character and appearance of the area including the Broadway Conservation Area (CA)
- the living conditions of the occupiers of adjoining residential properties
What decided it
Appeal A was dismissed due to the considerable collective harm to character and appearance caused by the steel framed structure and inappropriate fenestration, whereas Appeal B was allowed because the omission of the steel structure and the use of appropriately designed timber-framed windows with vertical bars on number 54 preserved the conservation area's character.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- LP3LP7LP1LP2D1D8HC1D4D14D3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 208
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision
More decisions in London Borough of Hackney
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Notice varied and upheld18 September 202633607242B Woodberry Down, Hackney, London, N4 2TG
- Allowed17 August 20266010972101 Dalston Lane, London, E8 1NH
- Allowed14 July 20266004379152 Bethune Road, London, N16 5DS
- Dismissed14 May 20266003534212 Millfields Road, London, E5 0AR
- Dismissed12 May 20263371819Railway Arches 348-349 Bocking Street, Hackney, London, E8 3RU
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.