Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 April 20243336039

Land South of Foxlands, London Road, West Kingsdown, Kent, TN15 6AP

a “single dwelling

Authority
Sevenoaks District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Wright A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would cause substantial harm to openness, and the modest housing contribution and limited economic benefits do not constitute very special circumstances to justify the development.

The modest benefit of one additional dwelling and limited economic benefits do not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness; the Green Belt protection policies provide a clear reason to refuse the development notwithstanding the shortfall in housing land supply.

Framework references: 11, 154

Plan policies cited: Policy LO8, Policy LO1

Judgments cited: Julian Wood v SSCLG and Gravesham Borough Council [2015] EWCA Civ 195; R (on the application of Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster) and others) (Respondents) v North Yorkshire County Council (Appellant) [2020] UKSC 3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.