Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld17 September 20253336487

23 Tyberry Road, Enfield, EN3 5AB

Planning appeal 3336487 at 23 Tyberry Road, Enfield, EN3 5AB (London Borough of Enfield) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 17 September 2025 by Inspector Griffin E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development upon the character and appearance of the surrounding area.

‘without planning permission, an unauthorised balcony has been erected on the roof of an existing single storey rear extension (outlined in blue on the plan for identification purposes only)’

Authority
London Borough of Enfield
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Griffin E
Postcode
EN3 5AB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development upon the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • The effect of the development upon the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers with particular regard to noise, overlooking, and loss of privacy

What decided it

The development harms both the character and appearance of the surrounding area and the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers through overlooking, loss of privacy and noise, contrary to the development plan with no material considerations to outweigh this harm.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D3 of the London PlanPolicy CP30 of the Enfield Core StrategyPolicy DMD6 of the Enfield Development Management DocumentPolicy DMD37 of the Enfield Development Management DocumentPolicy DMD8 of the Enfield Development Management Document

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

288 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Enfield

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed21 October 20266010541
    2 Queen Annes Grove, Enfield, EN1 2JP
  2. Allowed28 August 20266008361
    9 The Spinney, Winchmore Hill, London, N21 1LL
  3. Dismissed6 August 20266006826
    28 The Crest, London, N13 5JT
  4. Dismissed30 June 20266005153
    27 Abbey Road, Enfield, EN1 2QP
  5. Notice varied and upheld4 June 20263336794
    Land on West Side of Burnt Farm Ride, Enfield, EN2 9DY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.