Planning appeal decision
St Andrews Lane, Congham
Planning appeal 3336603 at St Andrews Lane, Congham (King's Lynn and West Norfolk Borough Council) was allowed on 10 July 2024 by Inspector Renaudon L, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the infilling of Congham bridge accords with the policies of the development plan for the area, particularly for the conservation of heritage assets.
Without planning permission, the unauthorised operational development involving structural infilling of former railway bridge using engineering fill and foam concrete with embankments formed on either side
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- other · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Renaudon L
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the infilling of Congham bridge accords with the policies of the development plan for the area, particularly for the conservation of heritage assets
- Whether other material considerations indicate a decision be taken that is not in accordance with the development plan
What decided it
The considerable (though tempered) benefit of the works in restoring a safe highway carrying capacity to the bridge, combined with the low heritage significance of the asset, outweighed the moderate heritage and slight landscape harm.
The moderate harm to the low-significance heritage asset and slightly adverse landscape/visual impact were outweighed/compensated for by the considerable benefit of a restored safe carrying capacity and the lesser benefit of removing anti-social behaviour, tipping the balance in favour of the development according with the development plan.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS08Policy CS12Policy DM15Policy DM13Policy CS06Policy LP20Policy 14Policy 2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 208
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in King's Lynn and West Norfolk Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed1 April 20263372985Land East Side Station Road , West Dereham , Norfolk , PE33 9RR
- Notice varied and upheld16 March 2026334693818 North Beach, Heacham, Kings Lynn, PE31 7LJ
- Split Decision28 November 202533248604 Harvestile Lane, Pentney, King's Lynn, PE32 1JS
- Dismissed25 November 20253340721Finesse Motorsport Ltd, The Common, Upwell, Norfolk, PE14 9AW
- Notice upheld24 November 20253359719Land at Priory Wall Mews, 10 and 12 Tower Place, King's Lynn, PE30 5DF
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®