Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Planning permission granted10 July 20243336603

St Andrews Lane, Congham

Planning appeal 3336603 at St Andrews Lane, Congham (King's Lynn and West Norfolk Borough Council) was allowed on 10 July 2024 by Inspector Renaudon L, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the infilling of Congham bridge accords with the policies of the development plan for the area, particularly for the conservation of heritage assets.

Without planning permission, the unauthorised operational development involving structural infilling of former railway bridge using engineering fill and foam concrete with embankments formed on either side

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
other · Other minor developments
Inspector
Renaudon L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the infilling of Congham bridge accords with the policies of the development plan for the area, particularly for the conservation of heritage assets
  • Whether other material considerations indicate a decision be taken that is not in accordance with the development plan

What decided it

The considerable (though tempered) benefit of the works in restoring a safe highway carrying capacity to the bridge, combined with the low heritage significance of the asset, outweighed the moderate heritage and slight landscape harm.

The moderate harm to the low-significance heritage asset and slightly adverse landscape/visual impact were outweighed/compensated for by the considerable benefit of a restored safe carrying capacity and the lesser benefit of removing anti-social behaviour, tipping the balance in favour of the development according with the development plan.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS08Policy CS12Policy DM15Policy DM13Policy CS06Policy LP20Policy 14Policy 2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 208

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in King's Lynn and West Norfolk Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed1 April 20263372985
    Land East Side Station Road , West Dereham , Norfolk , PE33 9RR
  2. Notice varied and upheld16 March 20263346938
    18 North Beach, Heacham, Kings Lynn, PE31 7LJ
  3. Split Decision28 November 20253324860
    4 Harvestile Lane, Pentney, King's Lynn, PE32 1JS
  4. Dismissed25 November 20253340721
    Finesse Motorsport Ltd, The Common, Upwell, Norfolk, PE14 9AW
  5. Notice upheld24 November 20253359719
    Land at Priory Wall Mews, 10 and 12 Tower Place, King's Lynn, PE30 5DF

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.