Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 April 20243336675

23 Audley Road, London, W5 3ES

Planning appeal 3336675 at 23 Audley Road, London, W5 3ES (London Borough of Ealing) was dismissed on 5 April 2024 by Inspector Barnes D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host property and the surrounding area.

the erection of a part single and part two storey rear extension; single storey side extension (following demolition of existing WW2 side air raid shelter);conversion of a garage into a habitable room including associated external alteration involving the insertion of a window in lieu of the garage door opening; loft conversion to habitable space; installation of four rooflights to rear and side roofslopes; replacement of windows with double glazed units to match existing; alteration to fenestration to front, side and rear elevation; and works to front garden, including reintroduction of the boundary wall

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Barnes D
Postcode
W5 3ES

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host property and the surrounding area

What decided it

The proposed changes to fenestration (uPVC windows) and the prominent double front door would cause unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the host property and the Conservation Area, with no identified public benefits to outweigh this harm.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 7.4Policy 7BLondon Plan Policy D4London Plan Policy D3

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

424 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Ealing

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266014340
    21 Northcote Avenue, Southall, UB1 2AX
  2. Dismissed27 October 20266013917
    94 Pitshanger Lane, Ealing, London, W5 1QX
  3. Dismissed27 October 20266012839
    Station Parade, Advertising Right Adj 1 Uxbridge Road, Ealing, W5 3LD
  4. Dismissed22 October 20266011704
    62, Cornwall Avenue, Southall, UB1 2TG
  5. Dismissed12 October 20266012335
    Land Rear of 4 Greenford Road, Greenford, UB6 9AT

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.