Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed8 May 20243336876

66 Raynham Avenue, LONDON, N18 2BS

a first floor side/rear infill extension

Authority
London Borough of Enfield
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Eggleton P

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The infill extension would significantly harm the character and appearance of the area by eliminating the subordinate, distinctive outrigger form and creating a prominent, unrelieved elevation that conflicts with design policies.

Plan policies cited: Policy D4 of The London Plan 2021, Policy CP30 of the Core Strategy 2010-2025, Policy DMD6(a&c) of the Development Management Document 2014, Policy DMD8(1b) of the Development Management Document 2014, Policy DMD11(1c) of the Development Management Document 2014

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.