Planning appeal decision
Land West Of 31 To 32 Church Street, Coundon, County Durham, DL14 8PJ
Planning appeal 3336936 at Land West Of 31 To 32 Church Street, Coundon, County Durham, DL14 8PJ (Durham County Council) was dismissed on 26 July 2024 by Inspector Mulloy C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the location of the development is acceptable with particular reference to the development plan.
erection of 51 no dwellings, together with formation of the site access, and associated landscaping and external works
- Authority
- Durham County Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Mulloy C
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the location of the development is acceptable with particular reference to the development plan
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- The effect of the proposal on highway safety, with specific reference to access and parking
- Whether the proposal would deliver Biodiversity Net Gain
- Whether the proposed houses and surrounding area would be safe from flooding
- Whether future occupiers of the proposed development would be at unacceptable risk from land instability
- Whether the proposal makes adequate provision for affordable housing and any additional need for open space and health facilities arising from the development
What decided it
The proposal's location outside the built-up area and settlement boundary, representing unacceptable development in the open countryside contrary to the development plan, combined with unresolved issues on highway safety, drainage, ground stability, and character harm, outweighed the benefits of housing delivery and affordable housing provision.
The benefits of market housing delivery, affordable housing provision (subject to legal resolution), economic benefits during construction, and 100% M4(2) dwellings collectively carried significant weight but were insufficient to overcome the harm to character and appearance, highway safety concerns, unresolved drainage and ground stability risks, and the statutory presumption in favour of the development plan.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy 6Policy 10Policy 15Policy 21Policy 25Policy 26Policy 29Policy 32Policy 35Policy 36Policy 39Policy 41
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 135Paragraph 173Paragraph 180Paragraph 186Paragraph 189
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Durham County Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed22 October 20266007418Land to the West of St Michael's Rise, Hawthorn, SR7 8BY
- Allowed10 September 2026600635255 Bradford Crescent, Gilesgate, Durham, DH1 1HL
- Dismissed11 August 20266006359The Copse, Foxes Row, Brancepeth, DH7 8DH
- Allowed24 July 20263375422Harehill Farm, Haswell Plough, Durham, Durham, DH6 2BA
- Allowed24 July 20266003014Land to the South of Wagtail Lane, Craghead, DH7 0DT
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®