Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld28 July 20253337099

16 Listria Park, London, N16 5SN

Planning appeal 3337099 at 16 Listria Park, London, N16 5SN (London Borough of Hackney) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 28 July 2025 by Inspector Douglas L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area.

the erection of a rear roof extension to both the main roof slope and outrigger and a ground floor rear side extension

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Douglas L
Postcode
N16 5SN

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether the development mitigates climate change and promotes biodiversity
  • The effect of the development on the living conditions of occupiers of 18 Listria Park, with particular regard to privacy

What decided it

The development's excessive height, width and depth caused significant harmful effects on the character and appearance of the area that were not outweighed by any material considerations, and the fallback position of the lawful development certificate scheme would cause notably lower harm.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D3 of the London Plan (2021)Policy LP1 of the Hackney Local Plan 2033 (2020)Policy D4 of the London PlanPolicy SI4 of the London PlanPolicy LP54 of the Hackney Local Plan 2033Policy LP55 of the Hackney Local Plan 2033Policy GG6 of the London PlanPolicy LP47 of the Hackney Local Plan 2033Policy LP2 of the Hackney Local Plan 2033

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 824 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hackney

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Notice upheld23 September 20263368635
    Flat 6, Brooks Lodge, 194A Hoxton Street, London, N1 5HU
  2. Notice varied and upheld18 September 20263360724
    2B Woodberry Down, Hackney, London, N4 2TG
  3. Dismissed14 May 20266003534
    212 Millfields Road, London, E5 0AR
  4. Notice upheld27 March 20263337600
    72 Powerscroft Road, Hackney, London, E5 0PP
  5. Notice upheld27 March 20263337599
    74 Powerscroft Road, Hackney, London, E5 0PP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.