Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed2 October 20243337134

Wrotham Hill Cottage Wrotham Hill, Dunsfold, Surrey, GU8 4PA

Planning appeal 3337134 at Wrotham Hill Cottage Wrotham Hill, Dunsfold, Surrey, GU8 4PA (Waverley Borough Council) was allowed on 2 October 2024 by Inspector Curnow R, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The main issue in both appeals is whether the Council's decisions to refuse to issue certificates of lawfulness were well-founded.

Use of roof space of the garage building for the purposes of habitable accommodation – contrary to condition 2 of consent WA/2003/2383

Appeal type
ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Curnow R
Postcode
GU8 4PA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The main issue in both appeals is whether the Council's decisions to refuse to issue certificates of lawfulness were well-founded.

What decided it

Appeal A turned on the Inspector's finding, applying established case law, that the container's size, permanence and physical attachment to the land made it a 'building' amounting to operational development; Appeal B turned on the additional evidence considered after the Hearing which demonstrated continuous ancillary residential use for the requisite ten-year period.

What the Inspector cited

Judgments
Cardiff Rating Authority v Guest Keen Baldwin's Iron and Steel Co Ltd [1949] 1QB 385; Skerritts of Nottingham Ltd v SSETR (No. 2) [2002] EWCA Civ 5569; Barvis Limited SSE and Anor [171] P&CR 1710; Cheshire CC v Woodward [1962] 2 QB 126; Gabbitas v SSE & Newham LBC [1985] JPL 630

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

36 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Waverley Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Notice varied and upheld17 April 20263374518
    Highfield Heights Farm Guildford Road, Runfold, Farnham, GU10 1PN
  2. Dismissed11 March 20263361018
    Busbridge Lane, Godalming, Surrey, GU7 1PU
  3. Notice varied and upheld7 January 20263348184
    Hyde Orchards, Hyde Lane, Churt, Farnham, GU10 2LP
  4. Notice upheld11 November 20253370074
    11 Broomwood Way, Lower Bourne, Farnham, GU10 3LP
  5. Notice varied and upheld11 November 20253328599
    Old Park Lane, Farnham, Surrey, GU10 5AA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.