Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 July 20243337180

10B Glynfield Road, London , NW10 9JX

Planning appeal 3337180 at 10B Glynfield Road, London , NW10 9JX (London Borough of Brent) was dismissed on 17 July 2024 by Inspector Han U, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the property and the surrounding area.

a dormer roof extension to rear of main roof; roof terrace over rear outrigger wing to provide external amenity space for the family dwelling; roof terrace screened with opaque glazing up to 1.7 metres height above deck level; new rooflights over rear outrigger wing; photovoltaic solar panels to roof of new dormer; replacement rear first floor windows with cills lowered to form Juliet balconies

Authority
London Borough of Brent
Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Han U
Postcode
NW10 9JX

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the property and the surrounding area

What decided it

The proposed roof terrace would create an obtrusive and dominant feature that would harm the character and appearance of the property and surrounding area, conflicting with development plan policies requiring development to achieve high quality design and respond to local distinctiveness.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D3 of the London Plan (2021)Policy DMP1 of the Brent Local Plan 2019-2041 (2022)Policy BD1 of the Brent Local Plan 2019-2041 (2022)Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document SPD2

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

513 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Brent

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266011176
    7 Chalfont Avenue, Wembley, HA9 6NW
  2. Allowed22 October 20266011738
    102 West Hill, Wembley, HA9 9RR
  3. Allowed9 October 20266010212
    276 Willesden Lane, London, NW2 5RB
  4. Dismissed6 October 20266013509
    115 Brondesbury Road, London, NW6 6RY
  5. Allowed1 October 20266011602
    28A Ridley Road, London, NW10 5UA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.