Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed25 November 20243337190

29 Edward Avenue, Aldridge, Walsall, West Midlands, WS98AX

I would like to apply for permission to use a very small section of my garage to cut hair which includes a small piece of worktop attached to the wall with a mirror above it also attached to the wall, a plug bank and a barbers chair. I would be working by appointment only so there would be no overlap of clients and there would be no requirements for clients to park on the road as our drive can accommodate at least three cars and our household only has one car. Our drive has a two dropped curbs, one at either side of our drive

Authority
Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
retail · Change of use
Inspector
Senior H

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • effect of the proposal on highway safety
  • effect of the proposal on the vitality and viability of nearby designated centres
  • effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers with particular regard to noise and disturbance
  • effect of the proposal on the character of the area

What decided it

The development conflicts with development plan policies requiring sequential testing for town centre uses and adequate parking provision, and has not demonstrated it would not harm highway safety, with these policy conflicts and harms significantly outweighing the limited benefits.

Framework references: 115, 91, 191

Plan policies cited: Policy T7, Policy T13, Policy CEN7, Policy S7, Policy CEN6, Policy S6, Policy GP2, Policy ENV10, Policy ENV32, Policy ENV2, Policy ENV3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.