Planning appeal decision
Land to the East of Lidl, Christy's Lane, Shaftesbury, Dorset, SP7 8QN
Planning appeal 3337301 at Land to the East of Lidl, Christy's Lane, Shaftesbury, Dorset, SP7 8QN (Dorset) was allowed on 12 June 2024 by Inspector Wildgoose G, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal is consistent with the objectives of local and national planning policies relating to housing, including provision of, or contributions towards, affordable housing and community infrastructure, having regard to financial viability.
redevelopment for retirement living accommodation for older people comprising 41no retirement apartments including communal facilities, access, car parking and landscaping
- Authority
- Dorset
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Wildgoose G
- Postcode
- SP7 8QN
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal is consistent with the objectives of local and national planning policies relating to housing, including provision of, or contributions towards, affordable housing and community infrastructure, having regard to financial viability
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, with particular regard to the effect on protected trees
- Whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the historic environment of Shaftesbury, including the settings and significance of nearby listed buildings, non-designated heritage assets and Shaftesbury Conservation Area
- The effect of the proposed development on local highway conditions and highway safety, with particular regard to access, servicing and provision of parking
- Whether the proposed development would provide for a suitable living environment for future residents and the effect on the living conditions of occupiers of nearby properties
What decided it
The Inspector found no harm or conflict with any development plan policy across all the issues considered, meaning the proposal accorded with the development plan as a whole.
the substantial benefits of housing delivery, older persons housing, the maximum viable affordable housing contribution, and efficient reuse of previously developed land were found to weigh in favour of the proposal, and with no identified harm the balance favoured granting permission even under a hypothetical paragraph 11(d) tilted balance
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy 1Policy 2Policy 3Policy 4Policy 5Policy 6Policy 7Policy 8Policy 11Policy 12Policy 13Policy 14Policy 15Policy 18Policy 23Policy 24Policy 25Policy SFHE2Policy SFTC1Policy SFTC4Policy SFDH1Policy SFDH2Policy SFDH3Policy SFDH4Policy SFDH5Policy SFDH6Policy SFDH7Policy SFDH8Policy SFDH9Policy SFGI1Policy SFGI3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 60Paragraph 77Paragraph 58Paragraph 57Paragraph 11Paragraph 226
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Dorset
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed15 October 20266010988Land North Of Castle Avenue, Okeford Fitzpaine, DT11 0RL
- Dismissed12 August 20266007277Shady Glades, Long Lane, Wimborne, BH21 7AQ
- Allowed15 July 20266004471Muston Down Farm, Birch Lane, Dorchester, DT2 7SU
- Allowed24 June 20266004904Twin Pines, Grange Road, St Leonards & St Ives, BH24 2QE
- Allowed27 April 2026600430611 Melverley Gardens, Dorset, Wimborne, BH21 1HJ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®