Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed20 June 20243337353

30 Heddon Court, Cockfosters Road, Barnet, Hertfordshire, EN4 0DF

Planning appeal 3337353 at 30 Heddon Court, Cockfosters Road, Barnet, Hertfordshire, EN4 0DF (London Borough of Enfield) was dismissed on 20 June 2024 by Inspector Townend K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the property is suitable for conversion in principle, having regard to the development plan policies, the availability of family accommodation and the clustering of flatted schemes in the area.

conversion of maisonette to two self-contained one- bedroom flats

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Townend K
Postcode
EN4 0DF

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the property is suitable for conversion in principle, having regard to the development plan policies, the availability of family accommodation and the clustering of flatted schemes in the area
  • whether the proposed development would provide adequate living conditions for future occupants, with particular reference to the size of the internal accommodation
  • whether or not the proposed cycle storage arrangements comply with local policy and guidance

What decided it

The proposal would result in the loss of a three-bedroom family unit without compensatory provision and would breach clustering restrictions under Policy DMD 5, contrary to the development plan's requirement to maintain a mix of house sizes and protect family accommodation.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DMD 5Policy DMD 8Policy DMD 37Policy DMD 47Core Policy 5Core Policy 4Core Policy 30Policy H10Policy D6Policy T5

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

386 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Enfield

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266012855
    77 Conway Road, London, N14 7BD
  2. Dismissed21 October 20266010541
    2 Queen Annes Grove, Enfield, EN1 2JP
  3. Allowed20 October 20266009773
    28 Wolves Lane, London, N13 6DR
  4. Dismissed29 September 20266010207
    61 Hawthorn Road, London, N18 1EY
  5. Dismissed28 September 20266012598
    21 Merrivale, London, N14 4TE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.