Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 September 20243337699

358 Bromley Road, Catford, SE6 2RT

Planning appeal 3337699 at 358 Bromley Road, Catford, SE6 2RT (London Borough of Lewisham) was dismissed on 11 September 2024 by Inspector Lancaster K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on flood risk, including surface water drainage.

the construction of two flats including shared gardens and private amenity space

Authority
London Borough of Lewisham
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Lancaster K
Postcode
SE6 3AB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on flood risk, including surface water drainage
  • the effect of the proposed development on archaeology
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The failure to provide sufficient information to demonstrate that the proposed development would not result in adverse local flooding impacts and would comply with sustainable drainage requirements, combined with the absence of adequate archaeological assessment for a site within an Archaeological Priority Area.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SI13 of the London Plan 2021Policy 10 of the Lewisham Core StrategyPolicy HC1 of the London PlanPolicy 16 of the Lewisham Core StrategyPolicy DM37 of the Lewisham Development Management Local PlanPolicy 15 of the Lewisham Core StrategyPolicy 30 of the Lewisham Development Management Local PlanPolicy 33 of the Lewisham Development Management Local PlanPolicies D3 and D4 of the London Plan
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 173Paragraph 200Paragraph 135Paragraph 130

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

318 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Lewisham

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed8 July 20266005937
    1 A Harcourt Road, London, SE4 2AJ
  2. Allowed9 March 20266002486
    156 Marvels Lane, London, SE12 9PG
  3. Dismissed5 August 20253365901
    7 Kinver Road, London, Lewisham, SE26 4NT
  4. Allowed22 August 20243340234
    Raymond Close, London, SE26 6DW
  5. Allowed12 June 20243325078
    Miriam Lodge, 185 Dartmouth Road, London, SE26 4RQ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.