Planning appeal decision
The Vicarage Church Road, Tenterden, Ashford, Kent, TN30 6AT
Planning appeal 3337797 at The Vicarage Church Road, Tenterden, Ashford, Kent, TN30 6AT (Ashford Borough Council) was dismissed on 25 November 2024 by Inspector James A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, having special regard to the desirability of preserving the setting of a Grade I listed building, known as 'Parish Church of St Mildred' and the extent to which the proposal would preserve or enhance the Tenterden Conservation Area.
Proposed alterations to Vicarage, erection of three detached dwellings and construction of twenty bay Church car park
- Authority
- Ashford Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- James A
- Postcode
- TN30 6AT
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, having special regard to the desirability of preserving the setting of a Grade I listed building, known as 'Parish Church of St Mildred' and the extent to which the proposal would preserve or enhance the Tenterden Conservation Area
- trees
- the provision of community facilities in the locality
What decided it
The proposal would cause significant harm to the character and appearance of the Conservation Area and fail to preserve the setting of a Grade I listed building, which are designated heritage assets that provide a clear reason for refusal under paragraph 11(d) of the Framework, notwithstanding the Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply.
The presumption in favour of sustainable development under paragraph 11(d) of the Framework was disapplied because policies protecting designated heritage assets (the Conservation Area and Grade I listed building) provided a clear reason for refusing the development; the modest housing contribution and moderate community facility benefits did not outweigh the significant heritage harm.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SP6Policy HOU3aPolicy HOU10Policy ENV3aPolicy ENV13Policy ENV14Policy COM1Policy TEN NP4Policy TEN NP1Policy TEN NP3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 182Paragraph 202Paragraph 203Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Ashford Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed29 October 20266007592Homestall Farm, Ashford Road, High Halden, TN26 3BS
- Dismissed26 October 20266009946Daniel Farm, Smarden Bell Road, Pluckley, TN27 0SY
- Dismissed8 October 20266012673Land 150metres East by Southeast of Barkleys Farm, Burnthouse Lane, Smarden, TN27 8QQ
- Dismissed30 September 202660117174-6 Ashford Road, Tenterden, TN30 6QU
- Dismissed30 September 202660117144-6 Ashford Road, Tenterden, TN30 6QU
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®