Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld24 September 20243337807

Bank Ground Farm, CONISTON, LA21 8AA

Authority
Lake District
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Other minor developments
Inspector
Freer P

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether copies of the enforcement notices were served as required by Section 172 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
  • Whether the matters alleged in the notices have occurred
  • Whether the matters alleged constitute a breach of planning control
  • Whether enforcement action could be taken at the date the notices were issued
  • Whether planning permission ought to be granted for the development
  • Whether the requirements of the notices exceed what is necessary
  • Whether the periods for compliance are reasonable

What decided it

The raised platforms constitute operational development requiring planning permission, and the development causes unacceptable harm to landscape character, National Park scenic beauty, World Heritage Site significance, and biodiversity that cannot be outweighed by the limited public benefits.

Framework references: 182, 195, 205, 207, 208

Plan policies cited: Policy 01, Policy 02, Policy 03, Policy 04, Policy 05, Policy 06, Policy 07, Policy 24, Policy CNP1, Policy CNP2, Policy CNP8

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.