Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed23 July 20243337969

72 Maresfield Gardens, London, NW3 5TD

Planning appeal 3337969 at 72 Maresfield Gardens, London, NW3 5TD (London Borough of Camden) was dismissed on 23 July 2024 by Inspector Teasdale N, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development justifies the need for active cooling.

installation of 2x air condensing units, 1x extract duct, 1x gas meter box and 1x external lighting box to the southern passage to residential dwelling. (Retrospective)

Authority
London Borough of Camden
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Teasdale N
Postcode
NW3 5TD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development justifies the need for active cooling
  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the host building and surrounding area, including whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Fitzjohns Netherhall Conservation Area

What decided it

The development fails to justify the need for active cooling through adequate thermal modelling demonstrating that all preferred passive cooling measures in the cooling hierarchy have been exhausted, contrary to Policy CC2 of the Camden Local Plan.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CC1Policy CC2Policy D1Policy D2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 205

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

648 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Camden

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed13 October 20266013300
    166 Grafton Road, London, NW5 4BA
  2. Allowed12 October 20266007435
    Footpath Adjacent, 2 Castlehaven Road, London, NW1 8QU
  3. Allowed12 October 20266007433
    Footpath Adjacent, 2 Castlehaven Road, London, NW1 8QU
  4. Allowed12 October 20266007308
    Camden Road, Outside No.'s 84 - 92, London, NW1 9DY
  5. Allowed12 October 20266007299
    Camden Road, Outside No.'s 84 - 92, London, NW1 9DY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.