®Planning appeal decision
72 Maresfield Gardens, London, NW3 5TD
installation of 2x air condensing units, 1x extract duct, 1x gas meter box and 1x external lighting box to the southern passage to residential dwelling. (Retrospective)
- Authority
- London Borough of Camden
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- other · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Teasdale N
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the development justifies the need for active cooling
- The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the host building and surrounding area, including whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Fitzjohns Netherhall Conservation Area
What decided it
The development fails to justify the need for active cooling through adequate thermal modelling demonstrating that all preferred passive cooling measures in the cooling hierarchy have been exhausted, contrary to Policy CC2 of the Camden Local Plan.
Framework references: 205
Plan policies cited: Policy CC1, Policy CC2, Policy D1, Policy D2
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.