Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed28 June 20243338241

130 Clapton Common, London, E5 9AG

Planning appeal 3338241 at 130 Clapton Common, London, E5 9AG (London Borough of Hackney) was allowed on 28 June 2024 by Inspector Bowyer J, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether or not the proposed change of use would be acceptable having regard to the development plan and policies relevant to (i) the provision of family housing, and (ii) the provision of places of worship.

change of use from a dwelling (Use Class C3) to a Synagogue (Use Class F1(f))

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
community-institutional · Change of use
Inspector
Bowyer J
Postcode
E5 9AG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether or not the proposed change of use would be acceptable having regard to the development plan and policies relevant to (i) the provision of family housing, and (ii) the provision of places of worship

What decided it

The demonstrable and pressing need for a synagogue to serve the Pnei Menachem community, with little realistic prospect of that need being met other than through loss of the residential floorspace, outweighed the harm from loss of the dwelling.

the significant weight attached to provision of the community facility for use as a place of worship outweighed the loss of the dwelling, which was no longer particularly well-suited to family occupation, so the harm and development plan conflict were outweighed by other considerations

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy GG4 of the LPPolicy PP4 of the LP33Policy H14 of the LP33Policy H8 of the LPPolicy LP24 of the LP33Policy AAP5Policy S1 of the LPPolicy LP45 of the LP33LP33 Policy LP8Policy LP14

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

715 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hackney

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed1 October 20266010033
    259 Wick Road, Hackney, London, E9 5DG
  2. Notice varied and upheld18 September 20263360724
    2B Woodberry Down, Hackney, London, N4 2TG
  3. Allowed17 August 20266010972
    101 Dalston Lane, London, E8 1NH
  4. Allowed11 August 20266010297
    Flat A 141 Amhurst Road, London, E8 2AW
  5. Allowed14 July 20266004379
    152 Bethune Road, London, N16 5DS

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.