Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed31 July 20243338404

Rear of 413-415 Ilford Lane, Ilford, London, IG1 2SN

Planning appeal 3338404 at Rear of 413-415 Ilford Lane, Ilford, London, IG1 2SN (London Borough of Redbridge) was dismissed on 31 July 2024 by Inspector Williams K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the area.

first floor rear extension to extend existing flats and proposed second floor extension to create 1x1 bedroom self-contained flat with

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Williams K
Postcode
IG1 2SN

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the proposal would provide adequate living conditions for the future occupiers

What decided it

The unacceptably harmful effect upon the character and appearance of the area and the failure to meet the minimum floor-to-ceiling height requirement for the proposed flat, which together significantly and demonstrably outweighed the modest benefits of housing provision.

The modest social and economic benefits of improvements to existing flats and provision of a new one-bed flat on a previously developed site attracted moderate weight, but the significant harm to character and appearance and the failure to meet living condition standards attracted significant weight, resulting in the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighing the benefits when assessed against the Framework taken as a whole.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy LP26 of the Redbridge Local Plan 2015-2030Policy D3 of the London PlanPolicy LP29 of the Redbridge Local Plan 2015-2030Policy D6 of the London Plan
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 187

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

529 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Redbridge

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Quashed On Legal Grounds29 September 20263372674
    Land at 112 Highbury Gardens , Seven King , Ilford , IG3 8AA
  2. Allowed25 September 20266013032
    289 Roding Lane North, Woodford Green, Essex, IG8 8LH
  3. Dismissed25 September 20263361999
    2A Hall Road, Chadwell Heath, Romford, RM6 4LH
  4. Allowed25 September 20263360229
    38, Hertford Road, Newbury Park, Ilford, IG2 7HF
  5. Notice varied and upheld23 September 20263369444
    12 Westrow Gardens, Ilford, IG3 9NE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.