Planning appeal decision
8 Ham Island, Old Windsor, WINDSOR, SL4 2JY
a replacement 3 bedroom dwelling following the demolition of existing dilapidated dwelling
- Authority
- Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Rafferty C
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposal on flooding
- whether the development would mitigate the effects of climate change
- the effect of the proposal on ecology and biodiversity
- the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers
- whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt with greater impact on openness than the existing building, and the harm to the Green Belt and other identified harms are not clearly outweighed by other considerations, so very special circumstances do not exist.
The presumption in favour of sustainable development under paragraph 11(d) of the Framework was displaced because the policies protecting the Green Belt provided a clear reason for refusing the development, notwithstanding the Council's shortfall in housing land supply.
Framework references: 11, 154
Plan policies cited: Policy QP5, Policy QP3, Policy QP4, Policy NR1, Policy SP2, Policy NR2
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®