Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld27 February 20253338553

46 Huxley Street, LONDON, W10 4QQ

Without the requisite planning permission and within the last four years, the installation of a new front door and the installation of security lights and a CCTV camera to the front of the Property at ground floor level (the ‘Unauthorised Works’)

Authority
City of Westminster Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Moss J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development preserves or enhances the character or appearance of the Queen's Park Estate Conservation Area

What decided it

The harm to the significance of the designated heritage asset, being less than substantial but of considerable importance, is not outweighed by the identified public benefits, and no clear and convincing justification exists for the harm in accordance with paragraph 208 of the NPPF and section 72(1) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990.

Framework references: 205, 208

Plan policies cited: Policy HC1, Policy 39, Policy 40, Policy 38, Policy 6

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.