Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed19 September 20243338596

102 Frognal, LONDON, NW3 6XU

‘the application seeks consent to extend the existing 2-storey side extension.’

Authority
London Borough of Camden
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Livingstone C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The impact of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host property, including whether it would preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the Hampstead Conservation Area and whether it would preserve the setting of the Grade II listed buildings known as 'The Oaks', 'Bay Tree Cottage', 'Numbers 104 and 106 and Attached Wall, Railings and Gate to Number 106', '108 Frognal', and 'Grove Cottage'

What decided it

The proposed extension would be substantially screened from public views by existing boundary treatments and mature landscaping, and would preserve the character and appearance of the conservation area and the setting of nearby listed buildings through its subservient scale, articulated design, and visual containment within the street scene.

Framework references: 56

Plan policies cited: Policy D1, Policy D2, Policy DH1, Policy DH2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.