Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 October 20243338664

Land and Barn east of Clayfield Road, Bretforton, Evesham, WR11 7HS

demolition of existing barn, erection of one self- build/custom build dwelling, new vehicular access, and all associated works

Authority
Wychavon District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Townend K

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the site is an appropriate location for the proposed housing, having regard to the development strategy for the area
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the site is an appropriate location for the proposed housing, having regard to the accessibility of services and facilities

What decided it

The significant harm to the character and appearance of the area and the failure to provide a sustainable location with appropriate accessibility to services and facilities, when weighed against the limited benefit of providing one self-build dwelling, demonstrably outweighed the benefits such that the presumption in favour of development did not apply.

The significant environmental and social harm from the effect on character and appearance and the undermining of sustainable transport patterns significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited benefits of providing one self-build dwelling and a financial contribution to affordable housing, such that the presumption in favour of development did not apply.

Framework references: 11, 15, 60, 63, 70, 83, 109, 114, 225

Plan policies cited: Policy SWDP 2, Policy SWDP 4, Policy SWDP 21, Policy SWDP 25

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.